Kinematic modelling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5

Seismicity And Tectonics, Intra-Plate Processes, Neotectonics, Kinematics Of Crustal And Mantle Deformation, High Strain Deformation Zones

Scientific paper

We apply a new kinematic modelling technique (program NeoKinema) to estimate neotectonic flow in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen. The models fit geodetic benchmark velocities, geological fault slip rates and stress directions (seismic moment tensor orientations) using a weighted-least-squares method. Models predict long-term velocities, anelastic strain rates and preferred fault slip rates averaged over timescales of 104-106 yr. While we find a few regions of low anelastic strain rate, the mean continuum strain rate in the preferred model is 2.2 × 10-16 s-1 (0.7 per cent Ma-1), so the India-Eurasia collision should not be modelled as an interaction between rigid microplates. For most faults, preferred fault slip rates agree with geological slip rates within their uncertainty bounds; this suggests that deformation imaged by geodesy over tens of years is consistent with deformation over 104-106 yr (given appropriate elastic corrections). We also calculate maps of long-term-average seismicity rate based on model fault slip rates and anelastic strain rates in the continuum, using the seismicity parameters of most comparable type of plate boundary. The pattern is generally in agreement with actual m > 5.67 earthquakes in the CMT catalogue (1977-2002), except that the Himalayan front, High Zagros and Altyn Tagh zones have been quieter than predicted. The spatial integral of our forecast over the orogen is 371 m > 5.67 earthquakes/25.75 yr, versus 238 which actually occurred. If this discrepancy has high significance, it means that some step(s) in our forecast method are faulty (such as the assumption of equal coupled seismogenic thickness in all continental convergent boundaries). If it is only an artefact of stochastic time-dependence, then this may have occurred in the orogen, in the external calibration region, or in both. Independent evidence suggests that large earthquakes (with many aftershocks) will occur along the Himalayan front in the future, possibly reducing this discrepancy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Kinematic modelling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Kinematic modelling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Kinematic modelling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1319863

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.