Is the Universe older than expected?

Computer Science – Graphics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Spectrum of the quasar APM 08279+5255, showing iron-cloud traces
Credits: Copyright: ESA, Graphics: MPE
Spectrum of the quasar APM 08279+5255, showing iron-cloud traces The left picture shows a photo of the quasar, taken by XMM-Newton. The dip in the spectrum of the quasar APM 08279+5255 is caused by the element iron. In a same way that our bones appear dark in X-ray photographs because they are opaque to X-rays, the outflowing iron clouds of APM 08279+5255 are opaque for X-rays that are created at the quasar's centre. At the 'absorption energy' characteristic for iron (marked by the red arrow), some part of the X-ray light is missing.
Artist's impression of the new 'unified model'
Credits: MPA/MPE
Artist's impression of the new 'unified model' for the different kinds of quasar activity According to this model, for a well-fed black hole, some part of the matter streaming towards the centre never reaches the black hole but is blown apart in a bipolar, cone-like outflow. This outflow is driven by the strong radiation pressure of the central object. In the case of APM 08279+5255, you are looking along the gas stream which is 'X-rayed' by the central light source.
ESA's Norbert Schartel and colleagues from the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik,Germany, found more iron than anyone thought possible in the extremely distant celestial object, APM 8279+5255. The object is a quasar, that is, a young galaxy containing an incredibly bright central region, caused by gas falling into a giant black hole.
APM 8279+5255 is 13.5 thousand million light years away. Scientists know this because they have estimated a property of its light known as the red shift, which is caused by the expansion of the Universe stretching the wavelengths of light emitted by the celestial object. XMM-Newton’s data showed that iron was three times more abundant in the quasar than in our Solar System.
Since iron is released by exploding stars, according to precise physical phenomena, and scientists think it builds up across the Universe gradually with time. The Solar System formed just 5 thousand million years ago, so it should contain more iron than the quasar, which formed over 13.5 thousand million years ago. The fact that the quasar contains three times more iron than the Sun is therefore a major puzzle.
One possible explanation is that something is wrong with the way astronomers measure the age of objects in the Universe. The almost-holy red shift-distance-age conversion would therefore be wrong. Fred Jansen, ESA’s project scientist for XMM-Newton, explains that this would mean rewriting the textbooks. "If you study the evolution of the Universe, one of the basic rules is that we can tie redshift to age. One distinct possibility to explain these observations is that, at the redshift we are looking at, the Universe is older than we think."
If the older-Universe interpretation is wrong, there is only one other, stranger possibility, according to Jansen. Somewhere in the early Universe there must be undiscovered 'iron factories', producing the metal by unknown physical means. Understandably, Jansen is cautious about this, saying, "This is the less likely solution in my opinion."
If such mysterious objects exist, perhaps XEUS (a next-generation X-ray satellite currently under study by ESA for launch sometime in the next decade) will discover them, because it will have the ability to see the very first galaxies.
In the shorter term, ESA is launching INTEGRAL, a gamma-ray-detecting satellite, in October 2002. It will observe exploding stars to study the formation of chemical elements and may explain the anomalous iron observations.

No affiliations

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Is the Universe older than expected? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Is the Universe older than expected?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is the Universe older than expected? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1666085

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.