Computer Science – Computers and Society
Scientific paper
2001-09-25
Computer Science
Computers and Society
29th TPRC Conference, 2001
Scientific paper
Although patent law purports to cover all manner of technologies, we have noticed recent divergence in the standards applied to biotechnology and to software patents: the Federal Circuit has applied a very permissive standard of obviousness in biotechnology, but a highly restrictive disclosure requirement. The opposite holds true for software patents, which seems to us exactly contrary to sound policy for either industry. These patent standards are grounded in the legal fiction of the "person having ordinary skill in the art" or PHOSITA. We discuss the appropriateness of the PHOSITA standard, concluding that it properly lends flexibility to the patent system. We then discuss the difficulty of applying this standard in different industries, offering suggestions as to how it might be modified to avoid the problems seen in biotechnology and software patents.
Burk Dan L.
Lemley Mark A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Is Patent Law Technology Specific? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Is Patent Law Technology Specific?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is Patent Law Technology Specific? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-516489