Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption

Details Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption

2001-09-30

arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0110002v1

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

28 pages, no figures; partially in response to gr-qc/0009081

Scientific paper

We analyze the arguments allegedly supporting the so-called Self-Indication Assumption (SIA), as an attempt to reject counterintuitive consequences of the Doomsday Argument of Carter, Leslie, Gott and others. Several arguments purportedly supporting this assumption are demonstrated to be either flawed or, at best, inconclusive. Therefore, no compelling reason for accepting SIA exists so far, and it should be regarded as an ad hoc hypothesis with several rather strange and implausible physical and epistemological consequences. Accordingly, if one wishes to reject the controversial consequences of the Doomsday Argument, a route different from SIA has to be found.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is Many Likelier than Few? A Critical Assessment of the Self-Indicating Assumption will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-83053