Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2003-02-07
Astron.Astrophys. 401 (2003) 325-338
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
14 pages, accepted for publication in A&A
Scientific paper
10.1051/0004-6361:20030115
Outburst mechanisms of SU UMa-type dwarf novae are discussed. Two competing models were proposed; a pure disk instability model called the thermal-tidal instability model (TTI model) and the enhanced mass transfer model (EMT model). Observational evidence for enhanced mass transfer from the secondary star during outbursts is critically examined. It is demonstrated that most evidence for enhanced mass transfer is not well substantiated. Patterson et al. (2002) have recently claimed to have found evidence for enhanced mass transfer during the 2001 outburst of WZ Sge. We show that their evidence is probably due to a misinterpretation of their observed light curves. Our theoretical analysis also shows that irradiation during outburst should not affect the mass transfer rate. A refinement of the TTI model is proposed that can explain why superhumps appear a few days after the superoutburst maximum in some SU UMa stars. We present our own interpretation of the overall development of the 2001 outburst of WZ Sge based on the TTI model that does not require the assumption of an unproved enhanced mass transfer.
Meyer Friedrich
Osaki Yoji
No associations
LandOfFree
Is evidence for enhanced mass transfer during dwarf-nova outbursts well substantiated? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Is evidence for enhanced mass transfer during dwarf-nova outbursts well substantiated?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is evidence for enhanced mass transfer during dwarf-nova outbursts well substantiated? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-294500