Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2001-05-07
Phys.Rev.D65:123001,2002
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Replaced to match accepted PRD version. 14 pages, 12 figs. Tiny changes due to smaller DASI & Maxima calibration errors. Expan
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.65.123001
We perform a detailed analysis of the latest CMB measurements (including BOOMERaNG, DASI, Maxima and CBI), both alone and jointly with other cosmological data sets involving, e.g., galaxy clustering and the Lyman Alpha Forest. We first address the question of whether the CMB data are internally consistent once calibration and beam uncertainties are taken into account, performing a series of statistical tests. With a few minor caveats, our answer is yes, and we compress all data into a single set of 24 bandpowers with associated covariance matrix and window functions. We then compute joint constraints on the 11 parameters of the ``standard'' adiabatic inflationary cosmological model. Out best fit model passes a series of physical consistency checks and agrees with essentially all currently available cosmological data. In addition to sharp constraints on the cosmic matter budget in good agreement with those of the BOOMERaNG, DASI and Maxima teams, we obtain a heaviest neutrino mass range 0.04-4.2 eV and the sharpest constraints to date on gravity waves which (together with preference for a slight red-tilt) favors ``small-field'' inflation models.
Tegmark Max
Wang Xiaomin
Zaldarriaga Matias
No associations
LandOfFree
Is cosmology consistent? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Is cosmology consistent?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is cosmology consistent? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-454851