Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable?

Details Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable? Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable?

2003-10-01

arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0310007v1

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

RevTex4, 36 pages, no figures

Scientific paper

We analyze both the feasibility and reasonableness of a classical Euclidean Theory of Everything (TOE), which we understand as a TOE based on an Euclidean space and an absolute time over which deterministic models of particles and forces are built. The possible axiomatic complexity of a TOE in such a framework is considered and compared to the complexity of the assumptions underlying the Standard Model. Current approaches to relevant (for our purposes) reformulations of Special Relativity, General Relativity, inertia models and Quantum Theory are summarized, and links between some of these reformulations are exposed. A qualitative framework is suggested for a research program on a classical Euclidean TOE. Within this framework an underlying basis is suggested, in particular, for the Principle of Relativity and Principle of Equivalence. A model for gravity as an inertial phenomenon is proposed. Also, a basis for quantum indeterminacy and wave function collapse is suggested in the framework.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is a classical Euclidean TOE reasonable? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-211899