Statistics – Methodology
Scientific paper
2010-10-02
Statistical Science 2009, Vol. 24, No. 3, 328-342
Statistics
Methodology
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS305 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of M
Scientific paper
10.1214/09-STS305
We review some aspects of Bayesian and frequentist interval estimation, focusing first on their relative strengths and weaknesses when used in "clean" or "textbook" contexts. We then turn attention to observational-data situations which are "messy," where modeling that acknowledges the limitations of study design and data collection leads to nonidentifiability. We argue, via a series of examples, that Bayesian interval estimation is an attractive way to proceed in this context even for frequentists, because it can be supplied with a diagnostic in the form of a calibration-sensitivity simulation analysis. We illustrate the basis for this approach in a series of theoretical considerations, simulations and an application to a study of silica exposure and lung cancer.
Greenland Sander
Gustafson Paul
No associations
LandOfFree
Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-519416