Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data

Statistics – Methodology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS305 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of M

Scientific paper

10.1214/09-STS305

We review some aspects of Bayesian and frequentist interval estimation, focusing first on their relative strengths and weaknesses when used in "clean" or "textbook" contexts. We then turn attention to observational-data situations which are "messy," where modeling that acknowledges the limitations of study design and data collection leads to nonidentifiability. We argue, via a series of examples, that Bayesian interval estimation is an attractive way to proceed in this context even for frequentists, because it can be supplied with a diagnostic in the form of a calibration-sensitivity simulation analysis. We illustrate the basis for this approach in a series of theoretical considerations, simulations and an application to a study of silica exposure and lung cancer.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interval Estimation for Messy Observational Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-519416

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.