Other
Scientific paper
Dec 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011agufm.p33a1761k&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011, abstract #P33A-1761
Other
[5494] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Instruments And Techniques, [6094] Planetary Sciences: Comets And Small Bodies / Instruments And Techniques, [6205] Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects / Asteroids, [6297] Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects / Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
Introduction: Our ambitions for space exploration have outpaced our ability to afford frequent visits to targets of interest. Launch costs and development times continue to increase for getting large space craft to deep space. This particularly affects workforce development and imperils opportunities for new development starts. The time has come to leverage technology advances (including advances in autonomous operation and propulsion technology) to reduce the cost and increase the flight rate of planetary missions, while actively developing a scientific and engineering workforce to achieve national space objectives. Background: As demonstrated by the 1994 Clementine mission, planetary exploration missions maximizing off-the-shelf components to obtain a focused set of measurement objectives can make meaningful contributions to advancing the frontiers of space exploration by achieving numerous science and exploration objectives. Near Earth Objects [NEOs] are interesting candidates for missions of this nature. While results from recent missions (i.e., Hayabusa, NEAR, Dawn) have dramatically increased our understanding of asteroids, important questions remain. For example, characterizing the properties of asteroid regolith is an important consideration for understanding telescopic observations of asteroids, as well as preparing for future asteroid human exploration. Spacecraft Concepts: There are many candidate target asteroids that are attainable with our concept. We envision a "mothership" carrying 2-3 nanosats to the target. The nanosats would serve as in-situ explorers. The spacecraft is notionally designed for launch on a Taurus II. Our study intends on validating the concept and our notional spacecraft design will be refined and presented. The current dry mass with nanosats is estimated to be 750kg. The 1999 JU3 mission concept is a rendezvous with a 950 kg of initial spacecraft mass, launched to a C3 of 4 km2/s2. Subtracting the spacecraft dry mass from the initial mass gives a propellant loading of 200 kg. The solution for this case required 115.3 kg of propellant, leaving a 42% propellant margin. Science Instrumentation: Key objectives of this notional asteroid explorer would include: (1) high-resolution surface topography; (2) characterization surface composition and mineralogy; (3) quantification of the radiation environment near an NEO; and (4) mechanical properties of surface, if a touchdown takes place. Each nanosat would notionally contain a stereo camera for navigation, an alpha proton x-ray spectrometer to make measurements of the surface chemistry, and a microscopic imaging system to characterize the particle size distribution of asteroid regolith; multiple nanosats would provided redundancy for the in-situ surface characterization phase of the mission and enable a rudimentary gravity map through radio signal tracking.
Elsperman M. S.
Klaus K. K.
Lawrence Stephen
Smith Daniel B.
No associations
LandOfFree
Innovative Strategies for Asteroid Precursor Exploration does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Innovative Strategies for Asteroid Precursor Exploration, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Innovative Strategies for Asteroid Precursor Exploration will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-870766