Computer Science
Scientific paper
Nov 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994adspr..14..135m&link_type=abstract
Advances in Space Research, Volume 14, Issue 11, p. 135-142.
Computer Science
Scientific paper
Different versions of manned closed ecosystems (CES) based on photosynthesis of unicellular and/or higher plants and chemosynthesis of bacteria are considered. Different versions of CES have been compared for applying them on Earth, Moon, Mars and Venus orbital stations, for Mars missions and planetary stations as well as to provide high-quality life in extreme conditions on the Earth. In mycrogravity we recommend CES with unicellular organisms based on photosynthesis or chemosynthesis (depending of the availability of the light or electric energy). For the planetary stations with Moon gravity and higher CES with higher plants are recommended. Improvement of indoor air quality by CES biotechnology is considered.
Bartsev Sergey I.
Gitelson J. I.
Mezhevikin V. V.
Okhonin V. A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Indications and counterindications for applying different versions of closed ecosystems for space and terrestrial problems of life support does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Indications and counterindications for applying different versions of closed ecosystems for space and terrestrial problems of life support, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Indications and counterindications for applying different versions of closed ecosystems for space and terrestrial problems of life support will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1021434