In defense of the two-lattice melt model: A comment on Ellison and Hess

Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

In a recent experimental study of rare earth element (REE) partitioning between immiscible silicate liquids, Ellison and Hess (1989) applied the two-lattice melt component activity model of Nielsen (1985) in an attempt to resolve the compositional dependence of REE partitioning. On the basis of their results they stated that the model failed to remove the compositional dependence. Upon examining their results we find that the application of the Nielsen (1985) two-lattice melt model removes 90-96% of the compositional dependence. Interpretations of melt structure based on application of the two-lattice model are nebulous due to the simplifying assumption of ideal intra-lattice mixing. Nevertheless, a comparison of the results of several versions of the model indicate that in this system, Ti behaves more like a network former than a network modifier. In addition, the assumption of Ca-Al complexing does not improve the effectiveness of the model at resolving compositional dependence over the assumption that excess Al acts as a network modifier.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

In defense of the two-lattice melt model: A comment on Ellison and Hess does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with In defense of the two-lattice melt model: A comment on Ellison and Hess, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In defense of the two-lattice melt model: A comment on Ellison and Hess will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1127166

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.