In All Likelihood, Deep Belief Is Not Enough

Statistics – Machine Learning

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Statistical models of natural stimuli provide an important tool for researchers in the fields of machine learning and computational neuroscience. A canonical way to quantitatively assess and compare the performance of statistical models is given by the likelihood. One class of statistical models which has recently gained increasing popularity and has been applied to a variety of complex data are deep belief networks. Analyses of these models, however, have been typically limited to qualitative analyses based on samples due to the computationally intractable nature of the model likelihood. Motivated by these circumstances, the present article provides a consistent estimator for the likelihood that is both computationally tractable and simple to apply in practice. Using this estimator, a deep belief network which has been suggested for the modeling of natural image patches is quantitatively investigated and compared to other models of natural image patches. Contrary to earlier claims based on qualitative results, the results presented in this article provide evidence that the model under investigation is not a particularly good model for natural images

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

In All Likelihood, Deep Belief Is Not Enough does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with In All Likelihood, Deep Belief Is Not Enough, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In All Likelihood, Deep Belief Is Not Enough will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-219908

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.