Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1995-11-17
Astrophys.J.466:757-763,1996
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
18 pages, with 2 figures included. Postscript. Submitted to ApJL. Latest version at http://astro.berkeley.edu/~max/repeaters.h
Scientific paper
10.1086/177549
We tighten previous upper limits on gamma ray burst repetition by analyzing the angular power spectrum of the BATSE 3B catalog of 1122 bursts. At 95% confidence, we find that no more than 2% of all observed bursts can be labeled as repeaters, even if no sources are observed to repeat more than once. If a fraction f of all observed bursts can be labeled as repeaters that are observed to burst v times each, then all models with (v-1)f>0.05 are ruled out at 99% confidence, as compared to the best previous 99% limit (v-1)f>0.27. At 95% confidence, our new limit is (v-1)f>0.02. Thus even a cluster of 6 events from a single source would have caused excess power above that present in the 3B catalog. We conclude that the current BATSE data are consistent with no repetition of classical gamma ray bursts, and that any repeater model is severely constrained by the near perfect isotropy of their angular distribution.
Briggs Michael
Hakkila Jon
Hartmann Dieter
Meegan Charles
Tegmark Max
No associations
LandOfFree
Improved limits on gamma ray burst repetition does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Improved limits on gamma ray burst repetition, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Improved limits on gamma ray burst repetition will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-129093