Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

11 pages, 7 figures, modified to match published version

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103502

To date, 14 high-redshift (z>1.0) galaxy clusters with mass measurements have been observed, spectroscopically confirmed and are reported in the literature. These objects should be exceedingly rare in the standard LCDM model. We conservatively approximate the selection functions of these clusters' parent surveys, and quantify the tension between the abundances of massive clusters as predicted by the standard LCDM model and the observed ones. We alleviate the tension considering non-Gaussian primordial perturbations of the local type, characterized by the parameter fnl and derive constraints on fnl arising from the mere existence of these clusters. At the 95% confidence level, fnl>467 with cosmological parameters fixed to their most likely WMAP5 values, or fnl > 123 (at 95% confidence) if we marginalize over WMAP5 parameters priors. In combination with fnl constraints from Cosmic Microwave Background and halo bias, this determination implies a scale-dependence of fnl at approx. 3 sigma. Given the assumptions made in the analysis, we expect any future improvements to the modeling of the non-Gaussian mass function, survey volumes, or selection functions to increase the significance of fnl>0 found here. In order to reconcile these massive, high-z clusters with an fnl=0, their masses would need to be systematically lowered by 1.5 sigma or the sigma8 parameter should be approx. 3 sigma higher than CMB (and large-scale structure) constraints. The existence of these objects is a puzzle: it either represents a challenge to the LCDM paradigme or it is an indication that the mass estimates of clusters is dramatically more uncertain than we think.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-265506

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.