Other
Scientific paper
Oct 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994icar..111..387h&link_type=abstract
Icarus (ISSN 0019-1035), vol. 111, no. 2, p. 387-416
Other
49
Cratering, Ejecta, Planetary Craters, Surveys, Venus (Planet), Venus Surface, Data Correlation, Image Analysis, Impact Melts, Magellan Project (Nasa), Size Distribution, Spatial Distribution, Synthetic Aperture Radar, Topography
Scientific paper
We present a global survey of the areal distribution, size-frequency distribution, and morphometric properties of the venusian impact cratering record. We explore the resurfacing history of Venus, crater degradation, ejecta emplacement, and cratering mechanics. The number of volcanically embayed and tectonically deformed craters from 0.5 to 1.0 km above mean planetary radius is disproportionately high for an otherwise crater-deficient elevation range. More resurfacing occurred in this range, an elevation range dominated by volcanic rises, rifts, and coronae, than elsewhere on Venus. Although the majority of craters appear to be relatively undisturbed and have intact ejecta blankets, some craters appear particularly `fresh' because thay have radar-bright floors, a radar-dark halo surrounding the ejecta blanket, and a west facing parabola of low radar return; 20, 35, and 8%, respectively, of craters with diameters greater than 22.6 km have these features. Characteristics of ejecta deposits for venusian craters change substantially with size, particularly at 20 km crater diameter, which marks the transition at which the boundaries of ejecta blankets go from ragged to lobate and the slope of the ejecta distance vs diameter curve steepens. Secondary craters are a ubiquitous part of the ejecta blanket for craters over 50 km but occur infrequently as isolated rays about smaller craters. Comparison of complex craters found on Venus with those of other planets gave results that were consistent with the idea that interplanetary differences in complex crater shape are controlled by interplanetary differences in gravity and crustal strength. The interplanetary comparison indicates that Venus, the Moon, and Mercury appear to have stronger crusts than do Mars and Ganymede/Callisto.
Herrick Robert R.
Phillips Roger J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Implications of a global survey of venusian impact craters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Implications of a global survey of venusian impact craters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implications of a global survey of venusian impact craters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1071480