Computer Science – Performance
Scientific paper
Oct 1982
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1982apopt..21.3713b&link_type=abstract
Applied Optics, vol. 21, Oct. 15, 1982, p. 3713-3718.
Computer Science
Performance
2
Conical Bodies, Imaging Techniques, Ray Tracing, Reflecting Telescopes, X Ray Telescopes, Asphericity, Collimation, Incident Radiation, Performance Tests, X Ray Astronomy
Scientific paper
The imaging effectiveness of an X-ray telescope consisting of a simple conical primary reflector and an aspheric secondary reflector is compared with a paraboloidal primary, hyperboloidal secondary of the same dimensions (Wolter type II). The rms spot size for the Wolter type II is considerably smaller being 1/28 as large as that of the cone-asphere for incident collimated light 1 min off the optical axis and 1/6 as large for incident light 12 min off the optical axis for a typical configuration. The cone-asphere spot size, on the other hand, is one half as large as that for a hyperboloidal primary, asphere secondary telescope of the same dimensions.
Burkhard Donald G.
Shealy David L.
Strobel G. L.
No associations
LandOfFree
Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1029462