Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope

Computer Science – Performance

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2

Conical Bodies, Imaging Techniques, Ray Tracing, Reflecting Telescopes, X Ray Telescopes, Asphericity, Collimation, Incident Radiation, Performance Tests, X Ray Astronomy

Scientific paper

The imaging effectiveness of an X-ray telescope consisting of a simple conical primary reflector and an aspheric secondary reflector is compared with a paraboloidal primary, hyperboloidal secondary of the same dimensions (Wolter type II). The rms spot size for the Wolter type II is considerably smaller being 1/28 as large as that of the cone-asphere for incident collimated light 1 min off the optical axis and 1/6 as large for incident light 12 min off the optical axis for a typical configuration. The cone-asphere spot size, on the other hand, is one half as large as that for a hyperboloidal primary, asphere secondary telescope of the same dimensions.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Imaging characteristics of a conical primary, aspheric secondary X-ray telescope will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1029462

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.