Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Galaxy Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2010-11-24
Astron. Nachr. 332 (2011), 172
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Galaxy Astrophysics
13 pages, 7 tables, 6 figures; accepted by Astronomische Nachrichten
Scientific paper
10.1002/asna.201011484
Star clusters are often hard to find, as they may lie in a dense field of background objects or, because in the case of embedded clusters, they are surrounded by a more dispersed population of young stars. This paper discusses four algorithms that have been developed to identify clusters as stellar density enhancements in a field, namely stellar density maps from star counts, the neareast neighbour method and the Voronoi tessellation, and the separation of minimum spanning trees. These methods are tested and compared to each other by applying them to artificial clusters of different sizes and morphologies. While distinct centrally concentrated clusters are detected by all methods, clusters with low overdensity or highly hierarchical structure are only reliably detected by methods with inherent smoothing (star counts and nearest neighbour method). Furthermore, the algorithms differ strongly in computation time and additional parameters they provide. Therefore, the method to choose primarily depends on the size and character of the investigated area and the purpose of the study.
No associations
LandOfFree
Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-586759