Identification of possible differences in coding and non-coding fragments of DNA sequences by using the method of the Recurrence Quantification Analysis

Biology – Quantitative Biology – Genomics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Starting with the results of Li et al. in 1992 there is valuable interest in finding long range correlations in dna sequences since it raises questions about the role of introns and intron-containing genes. In the present paper we studied two sequences. We applied the method of the recurrence quantification analysis (rqa) that was introduced by Zbilut and Webber in 1994. The significant result that we have here is that both Lmax and Laminarity exhibit very large values in non coding respect to coding sequences. Therefore we suggest that there the claimed higher long range correlations of introns respect to exons from many authors may be explained here in reason of such found higher values of Lmax and of Laminarity.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Identification of possible differences in coding and non-coding fragments of DNA sequences by using the method of the Recurrence Quantification Analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Identification of possible differences in coding and non-coding fragments of DNA sequences by using the method of the Recurrence Quantification Analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identification of possible differences in coding and non-coding fragments of DNA sequences by using the method of the Recurrence Quantification Analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-716156

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.