Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1998-09-17
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4 pages, 3 figures, Nuclei In the Cosmos V Supported by USDOE grant DE-FG02-94ER40870
Scientific paper
Contrary to claims that the problem has been solved, the astrophysical E1 S-factor of \c12ag is not yet well known. R-Matrix analyses of elastic scattering data,\c12ag data, and data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of N16 are not consistent and a small S-factor solution SE1(300) cannot be ruled out. In particular, data on the beta- delayed alpha-particle emission of N16 do not agree. The unaltered Mainz data do not agree with TRIUMF, but agree with both Seattle and Yale-UConn. The TRIUMF col- laboration has recalibratedthe Mainz('71) data; however, we dispute both the alteration of the Mainz data performed by the TRIUMF col- laboration and the very justification for the recalibration.
France III Ralph H.
Gai Moshe
No associations
LandOfFree
How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium Burning? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium Burning?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium Burning? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-536276