Computer Science – Digital Libraries
Scientific paper
2010-10-12
Computer Science
Digital Libraries
Scientific paper
Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multi-disciplinary research units (such as universities) by normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of differences in citation behavior. Furthermore, normalization in terms of citing papers abolishes the unsolved questions in scientometrics about the delineation of fields of science in terms of journals and normalization when comparing among different journals. Using publication and citation data of seven Korean research universities, we demonstrate the advantages and the differences in the rankings, explain the possible statistics, and suggest ways to visualize the differences in (citing) audiences in terms of a network.
Leydesdorff Loet
Shin Jung C.
No associations
LandOfFree
How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-608916