How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix?

Mathematics – Probability

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

34 pages. Typos and minor inaccuracies corrected, references updated

Scientific paper

Given a probability distribution in R^n with general (non-white) covariance, a classical estimator of the covariance matrix is the sample covariance matrix obtained from a sample of N independent points. What is the optimal sample size N = N(n) that guarantees estimation with a fixed accuracy in the operator norm? Suppose the distribution is supported in a centered Euclidean ball of radius \sqrt{n}. We conjecture that the optimal sample size is N = O(n) for all distributions with finite fourth moment, and we prove this up to an iterated logarithmic factor. This problem is motivated by the optimal theorem of Rudelson which states that N = O(n \log n) for distributions with finite second moment, and a recent result of Adamczak, Litvak, Pajor and Tomczak-Jaegermann which guarantees that N = O(n) for sub-exponential distributions.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-473496

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.