Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2004-06-17
Phys.Rev.D71:043004,2005
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4 pages, 2 figures. More info at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/skymap.html QMASK data and covariance matrix at http://w
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043004
Great efforts are currently being channeled into ground- and balloon-based CMB experiments, mainly to explore anisotropy on small angular scales and polarization. To optimize instrumental design and assess experimental prospects, it is important to understand in detail the atmosphere-related systematic errors that limit the science achievable with new suborbital instruments. For this purpose, we spatially compare the 648 square degree ground- and balloon-based QMASK map with the atmosphere-free WMAP map, finding beautiful agreement on all angular scales where both are sensitive. This is a reassuring quantitative assessment of the power of the state-of-the-art FFT- and matrix-based mapmaking techniques that have been used for QMASK and virtually all subsequent experiments.
de Oliveira-Costa Angélica
Devlin Mark
Miller Amber
Netterfield Barth
Page Lyman
No associations
LandOfFree
How accurately can suborbital experiments measure the CMB? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with How accurately can suborbital experiments measure the CMB?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and How accurately can suborbital experiments measure the CMB? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-177363