Computer Science – Artificial Intelligence
Scientific paper
2009-02-21
Journal of Applied Logic 6 (2008), pp. 287-317
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
ii + 73 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1104.2444
Scientific paper
Paul Bernays and David Hilbert carefully avoided overspecification of Hilbert's epsilon-operator and axiomatized only what was relevant for their proof-theoretic investigations. Semantically, this left the epsilon-operator underspecified. In the meanwhile, there have been several suggestions for semantics of the epsilon as a choice operator. After reviewing the literature on semantics of Hilbert's epsilon operator, we propose a new semantics with the following features: We avoid overspecification (such as right-uniqueness), but admit indefinite choice, committed choice, and classical logics. Moreover, our semantics for the epsilon supports proof search optimally and is natural in the sense that it does not only mirror some cases of referential interpretation of indefinite articles in natural language, but may also contribute to philosophy of language. Finally, we ask the question whether our epsilon within our free-variable framework can serve as a paradigm useful in the specification and computation of semantics of discourses in natural language.
No associations
LandOfFree
Hilbert's epsilon as an Operator of Indefinite Committed Choice does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Hilbert's epsilon as an Operator of Indefinite Committed Choice, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hilbert's epsilon as an Operator of Indefinite Committed Choice will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-370962