Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jan 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004spie.5167..101p&link_type=abstract
Focal Plane Arrays for Space Telescopes. Edited by Grycewicz, Thomas J.; McCreight, Craig R. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 51
Mathematics
Logic
1
Scientific paper
A comparative study between radhard-by-design and radhard-by-foundry approaches for radiation hardening of CMOS imagers is presented. Main mechanisms for performance degradation in CMOS imagers in a radiation environment are identified, and key differences between the radiation effects in CMOS imagers and that in digital logic circuits are explained. Design methodologies for implementation of CMOS imagers operating in a radiation environment are presented. By summarizing the performance results obtained from imagers implemented in both radhard-by-design and radhard-by-foundry approaches, the advantages and shortcomings of both approaches are identified. It is shown that neither approach presents an optimum solution. The paper concludes by discussing an alternate pathway to overcome these limitations and enable the next-generation high-performance radiation-hard CMOS imagers.
Cunningham Thomas J.
Hancock Bruce R.
Pain Bedabrata
Pedadda Pavani
Seshadri Suresh
No associations
LandOfFree
Hardening CMOS imagers: radhard-by-design or radhard-by-foundry does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Hardening CMOS imagers: radhard-by-design or radhard-by-foundry, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hardening CMOS imagers: radhard-by-design or radhard-by-foundry will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-828776