Mathematics
Scientific paper
Jan 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000stin...0038367.&link_type=abstract
Technical Report, Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL United States
Mathematics
Gravity Waves, Airglow, Emission, Mathematical Models, Temperate Regions, Amount, Construction, Auroras, Contamination, Descriptive Geometry, Oxygen, Polar Regions, Schedules
Scientific paper
Significant progress was made toward the goals of this proposal in a number of areas during the covered period. Section 5.1 contains a copy of the originally proposed schedule. The tasks listed below have been accomplished: (1) Construction of space-based observing geometry gravity wave model. This model has been described in detail in the paper accompanying this report (Section 5.2). It can simulate the observing geometry of both ground-based, and orbital instruments allowing comparisons to be made between them. (2) Comparisons of relative emission intensity, temperatures, and Krassovsky's ratio for space- and ground-based observing geometries. These quantities are used in gravity wave literature to describe the effects of the waves on the airglow. (3) Rejection of Bates [1992], and Copeland [1994] chemistries for gravity wave modeling purposes. Excessive 02(A(sup 13)(Delta)) production led to overproduction of O2(b(sup 1)(Sigma)), the state responsible for the emission of O2. Atmospheric band. Attempts were made to correct for this behavior, but could not adequately compensate for this. (4) Rejection of MSX dataset due to lack of coincident data, and resolution necessary to characterize the waves. A careful search to identify coincident data revealed only four instances, with only one of those providing usable data. Two high latitude overpasses and were contaminated by auroral emissions. Of the remaining two mid-latitude coincidences, one overflight was obscured by cloud, leaving only one ten minute segment of usable data. Aside from the statistical difficulties involved in comparing measurements taken in this short period, the instrument lacks the necessary resolution to determine the vertical wavelength of the gravity wave. This means that the wave cannot be uniquely characterized from space with this dataset. Since no observed wave can be uniquely identified, model comparisons are not possible.
No affiliations
No associations
LandOfFree
Gravity Wave Energetics Determined From Coincident Space-Based and Ground-Based Observations of Airglow Emissions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Gravity Wave Energetics Determined From Coincident Space-Based and Ground-Based Observations of Airglow Emissions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gravity Wave Energetics Determined From Coincident Space-Based and Ground-Based Observations of Airglow Emissions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-811601