Geometry of contact transformations and domains: orderability versus squeezing

Mathematics – Symplectic Geometry

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

This is the version published by Geometry & Topology on 28 October 2006 and includes the erratum published 1 February 2009

Scientific paper

10.2140/gt.2006.10.1635 10.2140/

Gromov's famous non-squeezing theorem (1985) states that the standard symplectic ball cannot be symplectically squeezed into any cylinder of smaller radius. Does there exist an analogue of this result in contact geometry? Our main finding is that the answer depends on the sizes of the domains in question: We establish contact non-squeezing on large scales, and show that it disappears on small scales. The algebraic counterpart of the (non)-squeezing problem for contact domains is the question of existence of a natural partial order on the universal cover of the contactomorphisms group of a contact manifold. In contrast to our earlier beliefs, we show that the answer to this question is very sensitive to the topology of the manifold. For instance, we prove that the standard contact sphere is non-orderable while the real projective space is known to be orderable. Our methods include a new embedding technique in contact geometry as well as a generalized Floer homology theory which contains both cylindrical contact homology and Hamiltonian Floer homology. We discuss links to a number of miscellaneous topics such as topology of free loops spaces, quantum mechanics and semigroups. An erratum is attached whose purpose is to is to correct a number of inconsistencies in the main paper. These are related to the grading of generalized Floer homology and do not affect formulations and proofs of the main results of the paper.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Geometry of contact transformations and domains: orderability versus squeezing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Geometry of contact transformations and domains: orderability versus squeezing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geometry of contact transformations and domains: orderability versus squeezing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-613199

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.