Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas

Details Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas

Apr 2004

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004e%26psl.221..215f&link_type=abstract

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 221, Issue 1-4, p. 215-225.

Other

14

Ash-Flow Calderas, Plate Subsidence, Ring-Faults, Numerical Modeling, Analogue Modeling

Scientific paper

Ash-flow, plate-subsidence (piston-like) calderas are bounded by a set of arcuated sub-vertical collapse faults named ring-faults. Experimental studies on caldera formation, performed mostly using spherical or cylindrical magma chamber geometries, find that the resulting ring-faults correspond to steeply outward dipping reverse faults, and show that pre-existing fractures developed during pre-eruptive phases of pressure increase may play a major role in controlling the final collapse mechanism, a situation that should be expected in small to medium sized ring-fault calderas developed on top of composite volcanoes or volcanic clusters. On the other hand, some numerical experiments indicate that large sill-like, elongated magma chambers may induce collapse due to roof bending without fault reactivation, as seems to occur in large plate-subsidence calderas formed independently of pre-existing volcanoes. Also, numerical experiments allow the formation of nearly vertical or steeply inward dipping normal ring-faults, in contrast with most of the analogue models. Using a thermoelastic model, we investigate the geometrical and mechanical conditions to form ring-fault calderas, in particular the largest ones, without needing a previous crust fracturing. Results are given in terms of two dimensionless geometrical parameters, namely λ and e. The former is the chamber extension to chamber depth ratio, whereas the latter stands for the chamber eccentricity. We propose that the (λ,e) pair determinates two different types of ring-fault calderas with different associated collapse regimes. Ring-fault region A is related to large plate-subsidence calderas (i.e. Andean calderas or Western US calderas), for which few depressurisation is needed to set up a collapse initially governed by flexural bending of the chamber roof. In contrast, ring-fault region B is related to small to moderate sized calderas (i.e. composite volcano calderas), for which much depressurisation is needed. Our opinion is that collapse requires, in the latter case, reactivation of pre-existing fractures and it is therefore more complex and history dependent.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geometrical and mechanical constraints on the formation of ring-fault calderas will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-733338