Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin

Details Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin

Dec 1991

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1991gecoa..55.3581m&link_type=abstract

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 55, Issue 12, pp.3581-3595

Mathematics

Logic

5

Scientific paper

We have determined (1) the abundance and isotopic composition of pyrite, monosulphide, elemental sulphur, organically bound sulphur, and dissolved sulphide; (2) the partition of ferric and ferrous iron; (3) the organic carbon contents of sediments recovered at two sites drilled on the Peru Margin during Leg 112 of the Ocean Drilling Program. Sediments at both sites are characterised by high levels of organically bound sulphur (OBS). OBS comprises up to 50% of total sedimentary sulphur and up to 1% of bulk sediment. The weight ratio of S to C in organic matter varies from 0.03 to 0.15 (mean = 0.10). Such ratios are like those measured in lithologically similar, but more deeply buried petroleum source rocks of the Monterey and Sisquoc formations in California. The sulphur content of organic matter is not limited by the availability of porewater sulphide. Isotopic data suggest that sulphur is incorporated into organic matter within a metre of the sediment surface, at least partly by reaction with polysulphides. Most inorganic Sulphur occurs as pyrite. Pyrite formation occurred within surface sediments and was limited by the availability of reactive iron. But despite highly reducing sulphidic conditions, only 35-65% of the total iron was converted to sulphide; 10-30% of the total iron still occurs as Fe (III). In surface sediments, the isotopic composition of pyrite is similar to that of both iron monosulphide and dissolved sulphide. Either pyrite, like monosulphide, formed by direct reaction between dissolved sulphide and detrital iron, and/or the Sulphur species responsible for converting FeS to FeS 2 is isotopically similar to dissolved sulphide. Likely stoichiometries for the reaction between ferric iron and excess sulphide imply a maximum resulting FeS 2 :FeS ratio of 1:1. Where pyrite dominates the pool of iron sulphides, at least some pyrite must have formed by reaction between monosulphide and elemental sulphur and/or polysulphide. Elemental sulphur (S 0 ) is most abundant in surface sediments and probably formed by oxidation of sulphide diffusing across the sediment-water interface. In surface sediments, S 0 is isotopically heavier than dissolved sulphide, FeS and FeS 2 and is unlikely to have been involved in the conversion of FeS to FeS 2 . Polysulphides are thus implicated as the link between FeS and FeS 2 .

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geochemistry of inorganic and organic sulphur in organic-rich sediments from the Peru Margin will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1538232