Statistics – Methodology
Scientific paper
2010-10-22
Statistical Science 2009, Vol. 24, No. 4, 398-413
Statistics
Methodology
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS289 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of M
Scientific paper
10.1214/09-STS289
Genetic investigations often involve the testing of vast numbers of related hypotheses simultaneously. To control the overall error rate, a substantial penalty is required, making it difficult to detect signals of moderate strength. To improve the power in this setting, a number of authors have considered using weighted $p$-values, with the motivation often based upon the scientific plausibility of the hypotheses. We review this literature, derive optimal weights and show that the power is remarkably robust to misspecification of these weights. We consider two methods for choosing weights in practice. The first, external weighting, is based on prior information. The second, estimated weighting, uses the data to choose weights.
Roeder Kathryn
Wasserman Larry
No associations
LandOfFree
Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-659328