Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
May 1987
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987p%26ss...35..603m&link_type=abstract
Planetary and Space Science (ISSN 0032-0633), vol. 35, May 1987, p. 603-607. Research supported by the Comision Nacional de Inve
Mathematics
Logic
4
Middle Atmosphere, Ozonometry, Stratosphere, Vertical Distribution, Absorption Cross Sections, Balloon Flight, Light (Visible Radiation), Remote Sensing
Scientific paper
As part of the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign, atmospheric ozone profile measurements were made using a large variety of different techniques both from balloon platforms and the ground. It is shown that, for most techniques, the measured height distributions agree to within + or - 5 percent with the exception of the remote visible absorption method. This + or - 5 percent uncertainty is of the order of the individual intersystem accuracy. It is suggested that since the differences with the visible absorption method are in magnitude rather than in form, the absorption cross-section data could be the possible cause for the discrepancy.
Aimedieu Patrick
Attmannspacher W.
de La Noë Jérôme
Komhyr Walter
Marche P.
No associations
LandOfFree
General comparison of ozone vertical profiles obtained by various techniques during the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with General comparison of ozone vertical profiles obtained by various techniques during the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and General comparison of ozone vertical profiles obtained by various techniques during the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-859850