Computer Science – Performance
Scientific paper
Aug 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009spie.7439e...4j&link_type=abstract
Astronomical and Space Optical Systems. Edited by Warren, Penny G.; Marshall, Cheryl J.; Tyson, Robert K.; Lloyd-Hart, Michael;
Computer Science
Performance
Scientific paper
This paper is a status report on recent scientific CMOS imager developments since when previous publications were written. Focus today is being given on CMOS design and process optimization because fundamental problems affecting performance are now reasonably well understood. Topics found in this paper include discussions on a low cost custom scientific CMOS fabrication approach, substrate bias for deep depletion imagers, near IR and x-ray point-spread performance, custom fabricated high resisitivity epitaxial and SOI silicon wafers for backside illuminated imagers, buried channel MOSFETs for ultra low noise performance, 1 e- charge transfer imagers, high speed transfer pixels, RTS/ flicker noise versus MOSFET geometry, pixel offset and gain non uniformity measurements, high S/N dCDS/aCDS signal processors, pixel thermal dark current sources, radiation damage topics, CCDs fabricated in CMOS and future large CMOS imagers planned at Sarnoff.
Andrews James
Bishop Jeanne
Cheng John
Elliott Tom
Janesick James
No associations
LandOfFree
Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: part III does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: part III, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: part III will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1303546