Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
May 2003
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003aas...202.4506y&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society Meeting 202, #45.06; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 35, p.764
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
The fluences and durations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) can be systematically underestimated for low signal-to-noise ratios. This is the result of a human operator selecting a time interval shorter than the burst interval, effectively ignoring burst flux in the fluence calculation. The gradual rise and decay of the FRED-type GRBs are especially susceptible to this bias. Because of the large number of FREDs in the BATSE catalogue, a series of Monte Carlo simulations of hypothetical FREDs have been analyzed. By varying the parameters of the Norris et al. pulse model, the properties of those FREDs most susceptible to the fluence duration bias have been identified. This work is funded by NASA grant NRA-98-OSS-03 and NSF grant AST00-98499.
Giblin Timothy W.
Hakkila Jon
Young Christopher K.
No associations
LandOfFree
Fast Rise Exponential Decay (FRED) Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Fluence Duration Bias does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Fast Rise Exponential Decay (FRED) Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Fluence Duration Bias, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fast Rise Exponential Decay (FRED) Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Fluence Duration Bias will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1369176