Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1999-03-23
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Accepted for publication in A&A, 12 pages including 6 figures. Abstract was abridged
Scientific paper
In spite of their overall success, semi-analytic models of galaxy formation and evolution predict slopes of luminosity functions which are steeper than the observed ones. This discrepancy has generally been explained by subtle surface brightness effects acting on the observational samples. In this paper, we explicitly implement the computation of surface brightness in a simple semi-analytic model (with standard CDM), and we estimate the effect of observational surface brightness thresholds on the predicted luminosity functions. The crucial free parameter in this computation is the efficiency epsilon of supernova feedback which is responsible for the triggering of galactic winds. With the classical formalism for this process, it is difficult to reproduce simultaneously the Tully-Fisher relation and the flat slope of the observational luminosity function with the same value of epsilon. This suggests that the triggering of galactic winds is a complex phenomenon. [...] The conclusion of this heuristic paper is that a more realistic description of SN feedback is needed, and that surface brightness effects should not be neglected in the modelling of galaxy formation.
Guiderdoni Bruno
Lobo Catarina
No associations
LandOfFree
Faint galaxies in semi--analytic models: how robust are the predictions? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Faint galaxies in semi--analytic models: how robust are the predictions?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Faint galaxies in semi--analytic models: how robust are the predictions? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-431773