Evaluating Default Priors with a Generalization of Eaton's Markov Chain

Mathematics – Statistics Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We consider evaluating improper priors in a formal Bayes setting according to the consequences of their use. Let $\Phi$ be a class of functions on the parameter space and consider estimating elements of $\Phi$ under quadratic loss. If the formal Bayes estimator of every function in $\Phi$ is admissible, then the prior is strongly admissible with respect to $\Phi$. Eaton's method for establishing strong admissibility is based on studying the stability properties of a particular Markov chain associated with the inferential setting. In previous work, this was handled differently depending upon whether $\phi \in \Phi$ was bounded or unbounded. We introduce and study a new Markov chain which allows us to unify and generalize existing approaches while simultaneously broadening the scope of their potential applicability. To illustrate the method, we establish strong admissibility conditions when the model is a $p$-dimensional multivariate normal distribution with unknown mean vector $\theta$ and the prior is of the form $\nu(\|\theta\|^{2})d\theta$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Evaluating Default Priors with a Generalization of Eaton's Markov Chain does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Evaluating Default Priors with a Generalization of Eaton's Markov Chain, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evaluating Default Priors with a Generalization of Eaton's Markov Chain will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-362690

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.