Other
Scientific paper
May 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006apj...642..615s&link_type=abstract
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 642, Issue 1, pp. 615-615.
Other
1
Scientific paper
In Table 4, for NGC 3245, the value of logLX,generic (col. [6]) should be 39.16, not 36.16. All other values in the table are correct, and the correct value was used in all of the calculations and plots.
In the last section of Table 2, ``Narrow-Line Type 1 Seyfert Galaxies,'' and in this section only, the units for column (4), the bolometric luminosities, are Watts, not ergs s-1, as in the rest of the table.
In equation (6) the constant 5.71×109 should be 5.71×108 in both cases. The correct form of equation (6) is thus:f=1+sqrt(5.71×108 Lsolar/LFIR)LFIR>Lc,0.75(1+sqrt(5.71×108 Lsolar/LFIR))LFIR<=Lc. (6)The correct formula was used in all calculations and plots. We would also like to reference A. M. Hopkins et al. (ApJ, 633, 86 [2005]), in addition to Bell (2003), for this formula.
Dudik Rachel P.
Gliozzi Mario
O'Halloran Brian
Satyapal Shobita
No associations
LandOfFree
Erratum: ``The Link between Star Formation and Accretion in LINERs: A Comparison with Other Active Galactic Nucleus Subclasses'' (ApJ, 633, 86 [2005]) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Erratum: ``The Link between Star Formation and Accretion in LINERs: A Comparison with Other Active Galactic Nucleus Subclasses'' (ApJ, 633, 86 [2005]), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Erratum: ``The Link between Star Formation and Accretion in LINERs: A Comparison with Other Active Galactic Nucleus Subclasses'' (ApJ, 633, 86 [2005]) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1028815