ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar?

Details ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar? ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar?

Sep 1999

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999apj...523l..97m&link_type=abstract

The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 523, Issue 1, pp. L97-L97.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

6

Scientific paper

In the Letter ``Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar?'' by D. Marsden, R. E. Rothschild, and R. E. Lingenfelter (ApJ, 520, L107 [1999]), there is a typographical error in Figure 1 that does not affect any of the scientific results of the Letter. The tick marks on the y-axis in this figure are mislabeled, indicating a wrong period for the peak in the chi^2 distribution. The values of the period and period derivative quoted throughout the text are the correct values and are unaffected by the typographical error. The corrected figure appears below.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and ERRATUM: Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1769460