Efficiency of different types of ED-tether thrusters

Statistics – Applications

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Spaceborne And Space Research Instruments, Apparatus, And Components, Observatories And Site Testing, Observation And Data Reduction Techniques, Computer Modeling And Simulation

Scientific paper

The efficiencies of electrodynamic-tether (EDT) thrusters made of single bare tethers with different types of cross sections, several parallel bare tethers, or a fully insulated tether with a three-dimensional passive end-collector, are discussed. Current collection, mass, and ohmic resistance considerations are balanced against each other in discussing efficiencies. Use is made of recent results on the validity domain of orbital-motion-limited (OML) collection, the current law beyond that domain, and interference effects between parallel bare tethers; and on current adjustment to variations in electron density encountered in orbit. Comparisons between EDT thrusters and electrical thrusters in terms of the ratio of dedicated mass to the total mission impulse show EDT to be superior for mission times over 50-100 days. .

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Efficiency of different types of ED-tether thrusters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Efficiency of different types of ED-tether thrusters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Efficiency of different types of ED-tether thrusters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1712014

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.