Earthquakes and Uranus: Misuse of a Statistical Test of Significance

Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

I ENTIRELY agree with Mr. Burr's statements contained in his first four paragraphs. I stated that this overwhelming evidence belongs to the three years contained in my Table 1. Regarding the total material of the 134 greatest earthquakes which were accurately observed over a period of 49 years (that is, the material contained in Gutenberg-Richter's book) I stated explicitly that ``after 1906 the correlation becomes less significant, but it remains greater than average''. In fact, in this complete set of 134 cases of the strongest earthquakes, Uranus was 39 times within +/- 1 hr. of the meridian (expected 22.3 times). That is significant at a level below 10-3. This disposes of the starting point of Mr. Burr's criticism.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Earthquakes and Uranus: Misuse of a Statistical Test of Significance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Earthquakes and Uranus: Misuse of a Statistical Test of Significance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Earthquakes and Uranus: Misuse of a Statistical Test of Significance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-946673

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.