Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science
Scientific paper
2011-09-05
Computer Science
Logic in Computer Science
Scientific paper
Given sets $\Phi_1=\{\phi_{11},...,\phi_{1u(1)}\}, ...,\Phi_{z}=\{\phi_{z1},...,\phi_{zu(z)}\}$ of boolean formulas, a formula $\omega$ follows from the conjunction $\bigwedge\Phi_i= \bigwedge \phi_{ij}$ iff $\neg \omega\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z \Phi_i$ is unsatisfiable. Now assume that, given integers $0\leq e_i < u(i)$, we must check if $\neg \omega\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z \Phi'_i$ remains unsatisfiable, where $\Phi'_i\subseteq \Phi_i$ is obtained by deleting $\,\,e_{i}$ arbitrarily chosen formulas of $\Phi_i$, for each $i=1,...,z.$ Intuitively, does $\omega$ {\it stably} follow, after removing $e_i$ random formulas from each $\Phi_i$? We construct a quadratic reduction of this problem to the consequence problem in infinite-valued \luk\ logic \L$_\infty$. In this way we obtain a self-contained proof that the \L$_\infty$-consequence problem is coNP-complete.
Mundici Daniele
Picardi Claudia
No associations
LandOfFree
Drawing Sound Conclusions from Unsound Premises does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Drawing Sound Conclusions from Unsound Premises, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Drawing Sound Conclusions from Unsound Premises will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-450172