Computer Science – Sound
Scientific paper
Jan 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992phrvl..68...37b&link_type=abstract
Physical Review Letters (ISSN 0031-9007), vol. 68, Jan. 6, 1992, p. 37-39.
Computer Science
Sound
23
Auroral Zones, Electric Fields, Electrostatic Waves, Particle Accelerators, Plasma Layers, Charged Particles, Electrostatic Charge, Space Plasmas
Scientific paper
It is pointed out that the continuing advocacy of electrostatic double layers as particle accelerators in the aurora and other space and astrophysical plasmas is fundamentally unsound. It is suggested furthermore that there is little reason to invoke static or quasi-static electric fields as the cause of auroral electron acceleration. Stochastic acceleration by electrostatic wave turbulence appears to present a natural explanation for this and for electron acceleration in other space and astrophysical plasmas.
Bingham Richard
Bryant Duncan A.
de Angelis Umberto
No associations
LandOfFree
Double layers are not particle accelerators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Double layers are not particle accelerators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double layers are not particle accelerators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-940372