Mathematics – Number Theory
Scientific paper
2007-03-05
Mathematics
Number Theory
15 pages, 0 figures
Scientific paper
Estimating the discrepancy of the hypergraph of all arithmetic progressions in the set $[N]=\{1,2,\hdots,N\}$ was one of the famous open problems in combinatorial discrepancy theory for a long time. An extension of this classical hypergraph is the hypergraph of sums of $k$ ($k\geq 1$ fixed) arithmetic progressions. The hyperedges of this hypergraph are of the form $A_{1}+A_{2}+\hdots+A_{k}$ in $[N]$, where the $A_{i}$ are arithmetic progressions. For this hypergraph Hebbinghaus (2004) proved a lower bound of $\Omega(N^{k/(2k+2)})$. Note that the probabilistic method gives an upper bound of order $O((N\log N)^{1/2})$ for all fixed $k$. P\v{r}\'{i}v\v{e}tiv\'{y} improved the lower bound for all $k\geq 3$ to $\Omega(N^{1/2})$ in 2005. Thus, the case $k=2$ (hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions) remained the only case with a large gap between the known upper and lower bound. We bridge his gap (up to a logarithmic factor) by proving a lower bound of order $\Omega(N^{1/2})$ for the discrepancy of the hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions.
No associations
LandOfFree
Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-113920