Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance

Details Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance

2009-07-25

arxiv.org/abs/0907.4419v2

Mathematics

Geometric Topology

V2; Added references and corrected typos

Scientific paper

Let $M=H_{+}\cup_{S} H_{-}$ be a genus $g$ Heegaard splitting with Heegaard distance $n\geq \kappa+2$: (1) Let $c_{1}$, $c_{2}$ be two slopes in the same component of $\partial_{-}H_{-}$, such that the natural Heegaard splitting $M^{i}=H_{+}\cup_{S} (H_{-}\cup_{c_{i}} 2-handle)$ has distance less than $n$, then the distance of $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ in the curve complex of $\partial_{-}H_{-}$ is at most $3\mathfrak{M}+2$, where $\kappa$ and $\mathfrak{M}$ are constants due to Masur-Minsky. (2) Let $M^{*}$ be the manifold obtained by attaching a collection of handlebodies $\mathscr{H}$ to $\partial_{-} H_{-}$ along a map $f$ from $\partial \mathscr{H}$ to $\partial_{-} H_{-}$. If $f$ is a sufficiently large power of a generic pseudo-Anosov map, then the distance of the Heegaard splitting $M^{*}=H_{+}\cup (H_{-}\cup_{f} \mathscr{H})$ is still $n$. The proofs rely essentially on Masur-Minsky's theory of curve complex.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-639678