Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited

Details Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited

Jul 2007

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007jahh...10..142k&link_type=abstract

Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (ISSN 1440-2807), Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 142 - 147 (2007).

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

Astro-Historiography, Carbon-14, Eclipse, Planets, Xia-Shang-Zhou

Scientific paper

Pankenier (2007) has responded to the critique by Keenan (2002) of
astro-historiographic chronologies of early China. The arguments of
Pankenier are assessed herein; the conclusion is that the arguments have
negligible scholarly merit. Some problems with radiocarbon dates are
also considered.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Defence of Planetary Conjunctions for Early Chinese Chronology is Unmerited will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-781679