Decentralized Two-Sided Sequential Tests for A Normal Mean

Mathematics – Statistics Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, conference

Scientific paper

This article is concerned with decentralized sequential testing of a normal mean $\mu$ with two-sided alternatives. It is assumed that in a single-sensor network system with limited local memory, i.i.d. normal raw observations are observed at the local sensor, and quantized into binary messages that are sent to the fusion center, which makes a final decision between the null hypothesis $H_0: \mu = 0$ and the alternative hypothesis $H_1: \mu = \pm 1.$ We propose a decentralized sequential test using the idea of tandem quantizers (or equivalently, a one-shot feedback). Surprisingly, our proposed test only uses the quantizers of the form $I(X_{n} \ge \lambda),$ but it is shown to be asymptotically Bayes. Moreover, by adopting the principle of invariance, we also investigate decentralized invariant tests with the stationary quantizers of the form $I(|X_{n}| > \lambda),$ and show that $\lambda = 0.5$ only leads to a suboptimal decentralized invariant sequential test. Numerical simulations are conducted to support our arguments.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Decentralized Two-Sided Sequential Tests for A Normal Mean does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Decentralized Two-Sided Sequential Tests for A Normal Mean, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Decentralized Two-Sided Sequential Tests for A Normal Mean will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-545004

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.