Computer Science – Graphics
Scientific paper
Jan 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011aas...21721004t&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #217, #210.04; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 43, 2011
Computer Science
Graphics
Scientific paper
By the time this is presented, the results of the 6th decadal survey ("The Blandford Report") will be known. Meanwhile, I have re-read the first five (Whitford, Greenstein, Field, Bahcall, McKee-Taylor) and endeavored to determine just which of the things they asked for we eventually got (HST, the VLA), which we did not (more common-used optical telescopes, a large deployable reflector in space), which things we got that no one seems to have asked for, and which might yet happen (JWST, Con-X now part of IXO). Prioritizing facilities also inevitably prioritizes science, and something will be said about how sub-topic emphasis has shifted, about the structure and demographics of the review panels themselves (whose total size peaked at 300+ for the Bahcall report), and about the demographic predictions made by the panels.
No associations
LandOfFree
Decades of Decision, Delight, and Despair does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Decades of Decision, Delight, and Despair, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Decades of Decision, Delight, and Despair will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1397417