Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects

Mathematics – Probability

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

199

Scientific paper

The orbital and absolute magnitude distribution of the near-Earth objects (NEOs) is difficult to compute, partly because only a modest fraction of the entire NEO population has been discovered so far, but also because the known NEOs are biased by complicated observational selection effects. To circumvent these problems, we created a model NEO population which was fit to known NEOs discovered or accidentally rediscovered by Spacewatch. Our method was to numerically integrate thousands of test particles from five source regions that we believe provide most NEOs to the inner Solar System. Four of these source regions are in or adjacent to the main asteroid belt, while the fifth one is associated with the transneptunian disk. The nearly isotropic comets, which include the Halley-type comets and the long-period comets, were not included in our model. Test bodies from our source regions that passed into the NEO region (perihelia q<1.3 AU and aphelia Q>=0.983 AU) were tracked until they were eliminated by striking the Sun or a planet or were ejected out of the inner Solar System. These integrations were used to create five residence time probability distributions in semimajor axis, eccentricity, and inclination space (one for each source). These distributions show where NEOs from a given source are statistically most likely to be located. Combining these five residence time probability distributions with an NEO absolute magnitude distribution computed from previous work and a probability function representing the observational biases associated with the Spacewatch NEO survey, we produced an NEO model population that could be fit to 138 NEOs discovered or accidentally rediscovered by Spacewatch. By testing a range of possible source combinations, a best-fit NEO model was computed which (i) provided the debiased orbital and absolute magnitude distributions for the NEO population and (ii) indicated the relative importance of each NEO source region. Our best-fit model is consistent with 960+/-120 NEOs having H<18 and a<7.4 AU. Approximately 44% (as of December 2000) have been found so far. The limits on this estimate are conditional, since our model does not include nearly isotropic comets. Nearly isotropic comets are generally restricted to a Tisserand parameter (with respect to Jupiter) of T<2, such that few are believed to have a<7.4 AU. Our computed NEO orbital distribution, which is valid for bodies as faint as H<22, indicates that the Amor, Apollo, and Aten populations contain 32+/-1%, 62+/-1%, and 6+/-1% of the NEO population, respectively. We estimate that the population of objects completely inside Earth's orbit (IEOs) arising from our source regions is 2% the size of the NEO population. This value does not include the putative Vulcanoid population located inside Mercury's orbit. Overall, our model predicts that ~61% of the NEO population comes from the inner main belt (a<2.5 AU), ~24% comes from the central main belt (2.52.8 AU), and ~6% comes from the Jupiter-family comet region (2

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-846390

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.