Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings

Details Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings

2012-03-06

arxiv.org/abs/1203.1080v1

Computer Science

Computational Complexity

submitted to ICALP 2012, with strengthened results included

Scientific paper

In this paper we investigate the problem of building a static data structure that represents a string s using space close to its compressed size, and allows fast access to individual characters of s. This type of structures was investigated by the recent paper of Bille et al. Let n be the size of a context-free grammar that derives a unique string s of length L. (Note that L might be exponential in n.) Bille et al. showed a data structure that uses space O(n) and allows to query for the i-th character of s using running time O(log L). Their data structure works on a word RAM with a word size of logL bits. Here we prove that for such data structures, if the space is poly(n), then the query time must be at least (log L)^{1-\epsilon}/log S where S is the space used, for any constant eps>0. As a function of n, our lower bound is \Omega(n^{1/2-\epsilon}). Our proof holds in the cell-probe model with a word size of log L bits, so in particular it holds in the word RAM model. We show that no lower bound significantly better than n^{1/2-\epsilon} can be achieved in the cell-probe model, since there is a data structure in the cell-probe model that uses O(n) space and achieves O(\sqrt{n log n}) query time. The "bad" setting of parameters occurs roughly when L=2^{\sqrt{n}}. We also prove a lower bound for the case of not-as-compressible strings, where, say, L=n^{1+\epsilon}. For this case, we prove that if the space is n polylog(n), then the query time must be at least \Omega(log n/loglog n). The proof works by reduction to communication complexity, namely to the LSD problem, recently employed by Patrascu and others. We prove lower bounds also for the case of LZ-compression and Burrows-Wheeler (BWT) compression. All of our lower bounds hold even when the strings are over an alphabet of size 2 and hold even for randomized data structures with 2-sided error.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Data Structure Lower Bounds on Random Access to Grammar-Compressed Strings will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-536564