CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Letter to the editor; reply to paper arXiv:1002.2769

Scientific paper

The article "Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (`Leiden') evaluations of research performance", published by Tobias Opthof and Loet Leydesdorff (arXiv:1002.2769) deals with a subject as important as the application of so called field normalized indicators of citation impact in the assessment of research performance of individual researchers and research groups. Field normalization aims to account for differences in citation practices across scientific-scholarly subject fields. As the primary author of the papers presenting the "Leiden" indicators and of many reports and articles reporting on the outcomes of assessments actually using these measures, I comment on the 3 main issues addressed in the paper by Opthof and Leydesdorff.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-81657

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.