Other
Scientific paper
Oct 1965
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1965rspsa.288..133d&link_type=abstract
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Volume 288, Issue 1412, pp. 133-145
Other
6
Scientific paper
Hoyle & Narlikar (1964d) have developed a new theory of gravitation, for which they claim that it is a direct interparticle action theory, that it 'is equivalent to that of Einstein in the description of macroscopic phenomena, and hence the situation is the same so far as the classical tests of general relativity are concerned', that the sign of the gravitational constant is correctly determined, and that it has other advantages over Einstein's theory such as implying the absence of solutions representing an empty universe. In the present paper, it is shown that these claims are largely unsubstantiated.
Deser Stanley
Pirani Felix A. E.
No associations
LandOfFree
Critique of a New Theory of Gravitation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Critique of a New Theory of Gravitation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Critique of a New Theory of Gravitation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1065788