Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

MNRAS, accepted; revised version of astro-ph/0209141

Scientific paper

10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06689.x

We re-examine a recent claim by Han et al. (2002) that the ionization energy in the envelope has to be included in the ejection criterion of common envelopes. In particular, we argue that (1) they include a mass loss rate prior to the onset of the common envelope that is too low; (2) They do not include the energy radiated by the accreting white dwarf companion, as well as that emitted by the core of the giant star; and (3) As argued by one of us before, the opacity in the envelope is too low for the efficient usage of the ionization energy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-500002

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.